1700
|
General Talk / Non-member Requests / Re: Closure of the GC
|
on: March 24, 2014, 10:13:06 PM
|
You know, I don't thin I could have said that any better than Mata.
Dadds, you do not have the authority ti disband the Council, that would take a 'super-majority' vote. With ITO a member, you only represent one vote out of two (not only not a majority, but not even close to a super-majority).
You may leave the Council anytime you wish, but you do not have the authority to disband.
Are you leaving the GC, or is this just shock rhetoric?
|
|
|
1701
|
Info Terminal / Updates / Re: Server upgrade
|
on: March 24, 2014, 01:33:29 AM
|
Dadds, this type of message from you...
...calm down, dude...
...at your age, you should be more mature than this...
|
|
|
1703
|
General Talk / News & Strategy / Re: The Galactic News Network report 03/15/2014
|
on: March 24, 2014, 12:56:10 AM
|
Actually Sargas to me what I will be doing is more so the job of a janitor then a pirate. Pirates rob people usually for profit. I am simply just taking out the trash so to speak. Also I would like to remind you that your corp and mine have a NAP.
Pirates attack for a number of reasons. Profit, Notoriety, Revenge, etc, etc, etc... ...yes, there is an NAP between the Empire and the other Empire and it will be honored... ...and it makes me happy that you accepted the job of 'janitor'. I have had some trash outside my house lately...
|
|
|
1709
|
Corporation General Talk / Bounty hunting / Re: ITO
|
on: March 22, 2014, 05:03:45 AM
|
1. This is not 'most games', this is a specific game. Corporations and Alliances are seperate entities.
2. Yes, he left while we were discussing his status...
3. ...more respect...?...?...you give each and all the same respect (especially if you consider yourself to be the only diplomat in the corp.)
4.
a. Where did it say that? During war, yes, you and the Naval Commander can have the ship. However, in peacetime it needed to go back to the original shared condition.
b./c. Give it a break. Every time I advanced the 'Corporate Ship' I was told "I WANTED TO DO IT MYSELF!"
So go ahead and try to convince yourself that someone else was wrong...
|
|
|
1710
|
General Talk / Non-member Requests / Re: In these troubled times
|
on: March 22, 2014, 04:24:01 AM
|
Please don't yell at me. I just asked this time because of JJ's departure. You are only two now (which really screws up voting). I am a signer of the original document, I feel a need to try to fix what we missed.
Or are you just afraid of my voice in council (I know that JJL was)?
Since your bringing me into this let me say this. When I was a part of the GC it wasn't that I was afraid of your voice. Part of the problem was you would sometimes say stuff that could make a delicate situation turn bad. Also speaking in like you did many of the times was against part of the GC charter anyways. 9. All corp members who are part of the GC may review GC meetings and discussions as long as they remain quiet. Discussions of GC business must be via the appointed Corp representative or Corp Leader. If a member wishes to discuss this matter they may contact their Corp Leader or representative about their thoughts privately and he or she can bring them to the table if they so choose. So as you can see when you posted in on the discussions I didn't have much of a choice in the matter. Every issue you had could have easily been taken to me and you know I would have looked over whatever you had to say and considered it. Yes I am aware I am violating this part of the charter right here by even speaking here to you. But I felt I needed to post this. The 'charter' being violated is now a moot point, you are neither a member nor are you restricted by anything that is GC mandated. Therefore, since you are the only moderator left on the GC child board, the Council itself seems to be a dead entity. You need to tell Sir Emi that you are no longer qualified to be a mod and let him know who is active in the GC and needs the mod status. And this needs to happen soon, say before April Fools Day...
|
|
|
|