Astro Galaxy - a realistic space exploration game

Corporation General Talk => Corporation Stance => Topic started by: sargas on January 02, 2014, 11:38:35 PM



Title: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on January 02, 2014, 11:38:35 PM
The Empire of Sargas is a peaceful corporation being predominately active in commercial activities. Because of this, piracy is banned.
 
The Sargasian Empire and the Sargasian Protectorate will mutually help each member.

The Empire of Sargas and the Sargasian Empire are interchangable, both represent and indentify the Corporation.

Whatever happened before joining the empire, happened before joining the empire.
Everyone starting in the empire, starts with a clean slate.  

The Empire reserves (read  'demands') the right to answer any question or accusation regarding any sargasian citizen.
 
This corporation is a corporation of redemption, growth, justice, and honor.


And, as always, clothing is optional (except for footgear, I require my pilots to wear footgear while on duty).

This is a tax-free corporation.

(edit - to put piracy banning in print)


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Madden on July 06, 2015, 04:48:13 AM
Hi sicksecret,

Good to see that you're learning.

Have you introduced yourself in the "Hi, my name is" board? If not, please do so. It will let the AG players know of your existence as well as know more about you. If you have any wishes or plans for the game, you can state so there. Thanks!  :)



Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: raphael on July 07, 2015, 07:54:33 PM
lol, it was just a bot.  :))


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on July 07, 2015, 09:52:39 PM
'tis why I ignored it...


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Madden on July 08, 2015, 05:00:38 AM
d**n. At least give the bot a 'bot-like' name. :))


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: dkuhnkc on September 04, 2015, 11:26:08 PM
TO: sarges:

Captain #5274 (emobearz/ridd1ck) is a war monger. I believe that his goal is to turn the EOS into a second IMG.

While part of the SPQNR, captain #5274 commented in corp chat many times on how boring COM missions were, how he would like to spice things up, and asked a lot of questions about PVP actions.

After he joined the EOS, while Consul Marcus was trying to negotiate with you, every few days Captain #5274 would send someone in the SPQNR a PM either bragging about the theft, calling us cowards, or both. This was not helped by the fact that you spent most of your time AWOL. You would not log on for days at a time, causing delay after delay after delay.

After the SPQNR split captain #5274 tried again to flame the fans of war, when he posted into the AG forum. After he was roundly shot down, he deleted his post. (just too bad that I saved a copy.)

Captain #5274 is also a coward. He has shut down his ships and is hiding at earth. Over the last 10 days we have checked every body in every system in the main cluster. that is 91 sectors, 716 systems, and more than 12,000 planets, moons, & asteroid fields. Since captain #5274 has at least 5 COM ships, we should have seen at least 4 of them. WE HAVE SEEN NONE.

I'm sorry, but 27 days of non activity or "probation" is not sufficient compensation for the grand theft of $338 million solars. Our minimum terms have been specified, and will not be altered. One of three things must happen.
1) The stolen modules or their equivalent must be returned.
2) We are paid their value of $338 million, either as QP, diamonds, or other materials. As an option you yourself can pay the $338M  and have captain #5274 pay you back.
3) Captain #5274 is forever denied the benefit of their use. (no COM's allowed) Ideally he should quit the game.

We do not recognize your 27 day (less than a month) deadline, and will continue to actively hunt captain #5274 until one of the above conditions is met, and yes we can and will keep it up for many months if necessary. As long as the rest of the EOS stands aside and allows us to administer justice against a thief, there is no problem. If however, you decide that you want to start another war, start attacking us, as we will not start a fight against any player other than captain #5274 unless forced to defend our self.

If you do declare war and we are forced to defend our self, know that war against us will be an entirely different proposition than the "war" against the IMG was. The IMG was only partially committed to it's wars, it was more interested in mining. In addition, it was conducting 5 different wars at once. We are 110% committed to justice from captain #5274. It is both are primary and secondaray purpose, we have no third purpose. How will your captains feel if they have trouble doing COM's because we keep sending their ship to the safe zone? How will your miners feel if they can't do any mining because we keep destroying their miners? And yes, with the ability to check every planet/moon/asteroid in every sector every 8-10 days, we will disrupt a large majority of COM's and capture most miners before they can recoup their cost from materials mined. And if you declare war, know that it will be total war, with no EOS member considered a non-combatant.

 We are not vindictive however, and if you declare war we will allow peace talks at any time. But before declaring war against us, consider the following: Is captain #5274 (emobearz/ridd1ck) worth [EOS] Kristen, [EOS] Atami, [EOS] JimGalaxy, and [EOS] Paolloo combined?

Is it worth going to war because of the actions of a thief and a pirate??? (which you """claim""" to deplore.) Even his new captains name proves his guilt, as it is the name of a thief in the 2,000 SciFi movie "Outward Bound".

It is definitely worth our time and energy to punish a thief. Do yourself a favor and follow the principles that you claim to have, get rid of captain #5274 before he destroys the EOS.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Ridd1cK on September 05, 2015, 09:09:06 AM
You arrogant prick, again you dissrespect Emperor Sargas in speech, maybe you should quit posting on forums you sound a bit frustrated giving ultimatums and shyat,  the dice has many facettes most of them you are unaware. You exagerate a bit too much, and you want to appear strong to the community but you are not, your intel is at best partial but vastly incomplete regarding ships and scans. You talk of retribution like if you are a facking paladin in quest for the holy grail and you threaten members of the EOS, but Person who sells themself for money many full damage blows can you actually take lets play a scenario here, how much would your full fleet cost to restock? Is it worth the trouble in damages casualties speedup costs and such, you would loose 10 times at least the amount specified which is 3 and half billion in one go.
Improuve your intel first,  stop being dissrespectful to Emperor Sargas, atm you just look like a frustrated, deranged buffon and it is hurting your overall chatisma.
a)I will not quit the game keep dreaming that.
b)I have more than 5 warships
c)if that is what your scouting came up I suggest to widen your search, I can be anywhere really I would focus on defending your CJJ stronghold. Everybody here knows scans are not sufficient and reliable.
And maybe...just maybe stop trying to sound like a frustrated diva I can still do coms and you would still fail son.
Piece of advice stop ordering people about, you are not the facking ruler of the universe, sure granted ppl can hear what you have to say but please stop ordering Corp leaders about, not all here to do your biding like you command everyone, you dont have that much power as you imagine you have, and it shows what was wrong with your Corp thinking in the first place. You all think you have a shot at being No.1 Corp by grinding gears, solars whatever by boring ppl to death or hoping TOAA and other ppl get so bored they quit make room for your sheep farmville Corp. Well guess what son, that ain't gonna happen. You should show more respect to your allies. Anyone with 2 eyes  and relaxed can see the backround messages and nobody likes being pushed about. So before you catch a cold do us all a favor and stop ur ranting its becoming tedious and you might end up quiting the game over frustrations. They should invent a lawyer position here, you are good at gathering bullshit and useles crap have fun with print screens im sure they are quite useful.
Penny for your thoughts.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 05, 2015, 09:32:23 AM
You arrogant prick, again you dissrespect Emperor Sargas in speech, maybe you should quit posting on forums you sound a bit frustrated giving ultimatums and shyat,  the dice has many facettes most of them you are unaware. You exagerate a bit too much, and you want to appear strong to the community but you are not, your intel is at best partial but vastly incomplete regarding ships and scans. You talk of retribution like if you are a facking paladin in quest for the holy grail and you threaten members of the EOS, but Person who sells themself for money many full damage blows can you actually take lets play a scenario here, how much would your full fleet cost to restock? Is it worth the trouble in damages casualties speedup costs and such, you would loose 10 times at least the amount specified which is 3 and half billion in one go.
Improuve your intel first,  stop being dissrespectful to Emperor Sargas, atm you just look like a frustrated, deranged buffon and it is hurting your overall chatisma.
a)I will not quit the game keep dreaming that.
b)I have more than 5 warships
c)if that is what your scouting came up I suggest to widen your search, I can be anywhere really I would focus on defending your CJJ stronghold. Everybody here knows scans are not sufficient and reliable.
And maybe...just maybe stop trying to sound like a frustrated diva I can still do coms and you would still fail son.
Piece of advice stop ordering people about, you are not the facking ruler of the universe, sure granted ppl can hear what you have to say but please stop ordering Corp leaders about, not all here to do your biding like you command everyone, you dont have that much power as you imagine you have, and it shows what was wrong with your Corp thinking in the first place. You all think you have a shot at being No.1 Corp by grinding gears, solars whatever by boring ppl to death or hoping TOAA and other ppl get so bored they quit make room for your sheep farmville Corp. Well guess what son, that ain't gonna happen. You should show more respect to your allies. Anyone with 2 eyes  and relaxed can see the backround messages and nobody likes being pushed about. So before you catch a cold do us all a favor and stop ur ranting its becoming tedious and you might end up quiting the game over frustrations. They should invent a lawyer position here, you are good at gathering bullshit and useles crap have fun with print screens im sure they are quite useful.
Penny for your thoughts.

Let's just log this before Convict 5274 deletes his cr@p again. Given that the player currently top of the rankings informed me before that it's ONLY sargas who speaks for EOS, it wouldn't surprise me if you we told to get back in your cage. Though it's always nice to see your true, foul-mouthed thieving, low-life nature shine through. It may help sargas make the correct decision in the end.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Ridd1cK on September 05, 2015, 09:40:40 AM
Says the man who only battles with words, you are a bit boring mate spewing again and again your rubbish, you're a bit of a loyal dog aren't you! You fancy yourself with big words but ingame you never did actually anything of note, so let me put it briefly to ya. Who da fack cared what ya think mate?  Grab a sausage with that I know how much you germans love sausages.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 05, 2015, 10:01:04 AM
Who da fack cared what ya think mate?  Grab a sausage with that I know how much you germans love sausages.

Another intel fail by our gipsy king. It's getting embarrassing now mate. I'm Dutch...


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Ridd1cK on September 05, 2015, 10:05:30 AM
Like I care?! Im in Amsterdam in 2 weeks, maybe I come slap ya boy,  that maybe wakes ya up, maybe then you are ported to ur childhood memories


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Madden on September 05, 2015, 10:43:47 AM
Like I care?! Im in Amsterdam in 2 weeks, maybe I come slap ya boy,  that maybe wakes ya up, maybe then you are ported to ur childhood memories

For some reason this reminds me of thedestroyer ...  :P


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 05, 2015, 11:19:52 AM
Like I care?! Im in Amsterdam in 2 weeks, maybe I come slap ya boy,  that maybe wakes ya up, maybe then you are ported to ur childhood memories

ROFL, keyboard warrior  :))

Two hours NE of Amsterdam is where you'll find me. But then, your superior intel no doubt already connected the Cruoningus -> Groningen dots.
PM me when you're there. We'll share a beer, or a brawl, whatever takes your fancy.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 05, 2015, 12:22:44 PM
BTW, Emperor, is threatening with physical violence an acceptable way of representing a once respected corp?


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: RegnadKcin on September 05, 2015, 03:07:40 PM
For some reason this reminds me of thedestroyer ...  :P

... about a week before he quit.  :)


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: dkuhnkc on September 05, 2015, 03:24:13 PM
You arrogant prick, again you dissrespect Emperor Sargas in speech, 1 maybe you should quit posting on forums you sound a bit frustrated giving ultimatums and shyat,  1 again the dice has many facettes most of them you are unaware. You exagerate a bit too much, and you want to appear strong to the community but you are not, your intel is at best partial  but vastly incomplete regarding ships and scans. 2 You talk of retribution like if you are a facking 1 and again paladin in quest for the holy grail and you threaten members of the EOS, 3 but Person who sells themself for money many full damage blows can you actually take lets play a scenario here, how much would your full fleet cost to restock? Is it worth the trouble in damages casualties speedup costs and such, 4 you would loose 10 times at least the amount specified which is 3 and half billion in one go.
Improuve your intel first,  stop being dissrespectful to Emperor Sargas, 5 atm you just look like a frustrated,  deranged buffon 1 that is 4 times so far and it is hurting your overall chatisma.
a)I will not quit the game keep dreaming that.
b)I have more than 5 warships 6
c)if that is what your scouting came up I suggest to widen your search, I can be anywhere really I would focus on defending your CJJ stronghold. 7 Everybody here knows scans are not sufficient and reliable.
And maybe...just maybe stop trying to sound like a frustrated diva 1 for the 5th time I can still do coms and you would still fail son. 8
Piece of advice stop ordering people about, you are not the facking 1 ad nasium ruler of the universe, sure granted ppl can hear what you have to say but please stop ordering Corp leaders about, not all here to do your biding like you command everyone, you dont have that much power as you imagine you have, and it shows what was wrong with your Corp thinking in the first place. You all think you have a shot at being No.1 Corp by grinding gears, solars whatever by boring ppl to death or hoping TOAA and other ppl get so bored they quit make room for your sheep 1 another time farmville Corp. Well guess what son, that ain't gonna happen. You should show more respect to your allies. 9 Anyone with 2 eyes  and relaxed can see the backround messages and nobody likes being pushed about. So before you catch a cold do us all a favor and stop ur ranting 10 its becoming tedious and you might end up quiting the game over frustrations. They should invent a lawyer position here, you are good at gathering bullshit and useles crap have fun with print screens im sure they are quite useful.

Penny for your thoughts.
1. the only one being disrespectful is you. again and again and again, multiple times.
2. game mechanics mean that no one can see your ship while you are hiding in the system entry safe zone, but WHD's prove you are there, I know several systems that you have had or currently have ships in the safe zone hiding.  
3. no threats, just the statement that if the EOS declares war on us to protect you, a proven thief, we will retaliate. (this is in fact what you want, for someone else to fight you battle after you started the fight in the first place.)
5. Get your facts correct. sarges has not claimed I was being disrespectful, but in addition:
A. A truthful statement that says in the past you have done this and this is not disrespectful.
B. Statements that if you do this, I will do that, and here is what I believe will happen because of it is also not disrespectful.
C.  It is also not disrespectful to recommend to someone not to do an action.
6. Open your eyes and learn to read, I said AT LEAST 5 warships. You had 12 ships when you left the SPQNR, although I doubt that all of them were warships.
7. The stronghold at CJJ belongs to the SPQNR, not me. I was just it's caretaker, and someone else is now caretaker.
8. You are not doing COM's now, you are hiding. And yes, you can do some COM's but when you start doing COM's again I bet we can stop quite a few.
9. And again you are wrong. SPQNR is showing respect to it's ally. Since Sarges has not so much as sent us a single PM, there is no treaty of any kind between the JMF and EOS.  
10. The only one that is ranting is you.

First, Just so there is no mistake. JMF will continue to come after you, captain #5274 until such time as you either return what you stole or we are paid for what you stole, and nothing will stop us in this mission. We are standing on the principle of honesty, and principles are worth far more than anything else. If sarges doesn't want a war or for us to go after a proven thief that is hiding behind him, he can always pay the bill himself.

Second, If the EOS wants to protect you, a known and proven thief, that is their right, but I advise against it, as I don't thing the EOS membership will like what our response will be, and it might be enough to end the EOS as a corporation.

Third, JMF will not start any hostilites against any other EOS member. If war is declared, it will be because the EOS declared it.



Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Matamaure001 on September 05, 2015, 03:45:01 PM
Your personal attacks have no place here. This is a game and only a game. Do you understand, only a game :(

And for the record, thedestroyer quit after I promoted him on top of my KOS list.

The temptation is great to repeat that.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: RegnadKcin on September 05, 2015, 03:50:05 PM
The temptation is great to repeat that.

Curious... hard to tell who you're referring to.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Ridd1cK on September 05, 2015, 04:15:00 PM
Shyat man, it's getting tiresome with Marcus klinging on every word, you  and darrell should start an interactive troll posting game, you guys are good at that, for me its getting quite tedious and boring  your posts again and again. Also ur sense of humor nonexistent, maybe uz twooz need a break from the game its a bit on the nerdie side for you guys. Anyways see you ingame


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: dkuhnkc on September 06, 2015, 06:06:02 AM
Shyat man, it's getting tiresome with Marcus klinging on every word, you  and darrell should start an interactive troll posting game, you guys are good at that, for me its getting quite tedious and boring  your posts again and again. Also ur sense of humor nonexistent, maybe uz twooz need a break from the game its a bit on the nerdie side for you guys. Anyways see you ingame

and yet more insults from the thief


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Ridd1cK on September 06, 2015, 09:19:54 AM
dude get a life... if you cant see you are copy pasting alot and quoting all the babble, means you are too much jacked in, it is just a game maybe unplug a bit, go enjoy nature or something, there are no insults there just facts


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 06, 2015, 09:32:21 AM
dude get a life... if you cant see you are copy pasting alot

Want a mirror for your birthday?  :12:


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Madden on September 07, 2015, 08:14:07 AM
Honestly, captain #5274 here sounds like a rather experienced captain....what was his name again? The leader of IMG ...  :))

Hope we can meet one day!


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on September 09, 2015, 02:03:23 PM
BTW, Emperor, is threatening with physical violence an acceptable way of representing a once respected corp?

No Sir, it is not!  Riddi1cK, please moderate your language and cease the real life threats.









(edit to show that I am opposed to real life threats and not the squabbeling  that happens in game)


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on September 27, 2015, 12:21:33 PM
New addendum to EoS Stance:

I am issuing a warning.
New Rome may not be as trustworthy as we thought.
When our UC treaty prevented hostilities over the recent events, two of their members left to form their own corporation, thus circumventing the treaty. Now that the issue has been resolved, they rejoin New Rome.
It looks to me as if they are ready to sign treaties, but have a handy way of getting around them.
This was a bad precedent to set.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Matamaure001 on September 27, 2015, 12:23:26 PM
I agree with you 100% sargas.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: dkuhnkc on September 27, 2015, 01:16:38 PM
When I left SPQNR I fully believed and expected that the final result would be war against the EOS, even though I worked to prevent it. I also expected that I wouldn't be able to rejoin the SPQNR. Thank god that the EOS and JMF were able to come to an acceptable conclusion and neither of the above turned out to be true.

To me it appears that it is the EOS that won't keep their word. On september 9, you gave ME permission to return to the SPQNR and still hunt Ridd1ck. Although I kept a copy of the text of my communications with Sargas, I am sorry that I did not realize that I would need to keep screenshots of the messages at the time.

Sarges in PM in green, My PM in orange. The first PM is in response to a long PM from me arguing against the EOS declaring war against the JMF:

[EOS] sargas(#572)
09-Sep-2015 13:51
Re: captain #5274

I agree with you and you are free to pester him as you see fit. The EoS has nether the desire nor the need to wage war.

My reply:

Thank you very much for this, it is much appreciated. I was not looking forward to the possibility of a war with the EOS for many reasons, only one of which is that in a war, no one wins.

One final request, I would like to rejoin SPQNR, if they will still have me. Will you still allow me to hunt captain #5274 if I do rejoin

[EOS] sargas(#572)
10-Sep-2015 15:02
Re: Re: Re: captain #5274

yes

Your reply was just one word, yes, meaning that I could return to the SPQNR and still hunt Ridd1ck. Now that it is resolved (I will no longer hunt ridd1ck) and I was able to return to SPQNR you issue a warning against the SPQNR even though you gave your permission for me to return on september 10th, more than two weeks (16 days) before I did so: From the SPQNR corporate logs: Captain darrellK has requested to join the corporation.    26-Sep-2015 18:53. To me this shows that the EOS has it's own problems with trustworthiness


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on September 27, 2015, 02:06:15 PM
The fact that I gave my permission for you to do what you were going to do anyway is rather irrelevant.

Your actions do not depend upon my permissions.

New Rome and it's vassal state JMK are seemingly trying to circumvent the UC treaty.

It has NOTHING to do with Marcus and Darrell (M&D) only New Rome's apparent policy of treaty circumvention.



(edit to add:

Will JMK please refrain from answering questions directed toward New Rome.)


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 27, 2015, 02:07:43 PM
New addendum to EoS Stance:

I am issuing a warning.
New Rome may not be as trustworthy as we thought.
When our UC treaty prevented hostilities over the recent events, two of their members left to form their own corporation, thus circumventing the treaty. Now that the issue has been resolved, they rejoin New Rome.
It looks to me as if they are ready to sign treaties, but have a handy way of getting around them.
This was a bad precedent to set.

Do you know what the bad precedent was, Emperor? To first question our most trustworthy allies' (SSS) decision to let a thief like #5274 in, and then having tonnes of butter on your head to do EXACTLY the same, while stalling my sincerest attempts to solve the matter diplomatically. A true ally would not have allowed that to happen, and would have acted in the spirit of the same UC you refer to right here. Then, knowing full well you've a proven thief on board, YOU are the one seeking using every excuse in the book to delay the proces again, stating procedural stuff all the time. But when someone else apply THEIR own interpretation to things like treaties, you're unhappy?

And as Darrell posted: YOU yourself gave us permission to return to New Rome.

I'm also issuing a warning: do not issue threats to New Rome, thinly veiled or otherwise. I told you the other day that if you think the game is getting boring for you and you want to spice it up with PvP combat, be my guest. But stop this nonsense, you're starting down the road Dadds went a long time ago.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 27, 2015, 02:08:48 PM
But let's get this over with: I will ask the Senate for an emergency vote on terminating our membership of the UC.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on September 27, 2015, 02:12:35 PM
EoS agrees to the dissolution of the UC accords.


(edit-

1. the editing is  expected

2. I am closing this topic because the Stance of the Empire of Sargas is NOT open to public debate! If y'all got somethin' ta say, say it on your own dime.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: Raptor on September 27, 2015, 02:17:09 PM
EoS agrees to the dissolution of the UC accords.

That would save us the bother of a 7 day debate followed by a 24 hour vote. But it's not my call, I'm off the executive council, another personal sacrifice I made for the sake of peace, and for the sake of the agreement we finally came to, and which we both ended expressing our desire to rebuild mutual trust. I can see now, how hollow a phrase that is. It leaves a bitter taste in my mouth, I tell you that.


Title: Re: Official EoS Stance (updated Jan 4, 2014 at 22:56 UTC)
Post by: sargas on September 27, 2015, 02:32:42 PM
since I started this topic before the 'fog of war' destroyed my identity, I will be re-posting the Imperial Stance.

This particular posting page will be ignored.

I apologize for your discomfort.