...I know what i meant there Rostin. ...
I also knew what you meant and equated protagonist with advocate (as you intended)
To Emperor Sargas of [EOS]1: As per the original treaty of alliances, the GC: Anyone supporting or allying with a declared outlaw will also be considered the same2. As i say, I await the treaty outcome with interest. The GC may be defunct, but its embodiment and ethics is still strong here among one of its Authoring founders.3
1 Please, my name is sargas (note, no caps) and while I am the leader of the Empire of Sargas, I prefer to be called sargas and not Emperor Sargas. I am just a citizen in the Empire (no better or worse than the rest of the citizenry).
2 The 'GC' is now a non-viable entity. You helped nail that coffin shut by not accepting the EoS into the Council. Then JJL left and it fell to arguing over the Council's validity between IMG and ITO. Any pacts, treaties, condemnations, or other matters are now Null & Void. There is no GC, ergo there are no 'Outlaws" and non-GC members still have the ability to tell you that your clubhouse rules only apply to those of you in the club.
3 I can claim the same status as being one of the 'founding authors' of the charter; bloody 'ell, I was the charters first signatory. Do not presume to believe that because we have differing opinions on many things, I don't value what we tried to do in the GC.
and Dadds, the 'Treaty' is still at the negotiating stage. Would you be interested in an alliance?
Show Posts
