Astro Galaxy - a realistic space exploration game
  March 29, 2024, 02:05:48 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Members Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: EoS  (Read 32453 times)
sargas
Guest
« Reply #45 on: January 30, 2014, 06:39:55 PM »

piracy is now banned in EoS.  I would have done it earlier but I felt our citizens were anti-pirate anyway and would't need a ban.  But since y'all are needing to see it in print...
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
Guest
« Reply #46 on: January 30, 2014, 06:54:25 PM »

JJ, how long was I a member of PMI?  The only time frame I can find is Dec 13, 2012 at 3:44am, the date of posting my first lesson (please do not confuse this with the little lessons you like to give) in mining.  And that was when Kerbos was still the Miining Leader.

In all that time, did I ever do anything that made you question my honor?
Report to moderator   Logged
JamJulLison
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +55/-44
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: January 30, 2014, 10:51:48 PM »

In all that time you didn't Sargas. That is what makes it hard for me now. Thinking back though there were signs that should have made me suspicious sooner but since your my friend I ignored them.  Such as when you were against adding Raph to the Outlaw.  Then you coming to his aid on the forums on the matter of his bug abuse. Add in him saying he wouldn't attack your Jupiter station. Then now the NAP with him. All this is enough to make anyone suspicious of you at the very least being a Raph supporter.  I want to trust you because you are my friend. But currently with how things are I have to say no to accepting you into the GC at this time. It is nothing personal. I am sorry if you feel I am insulting your honor. For now though I think it is best that we just wait and see how things turn out. You can always try to apply again at future date.


Oh and Mata, your word on it being ended isn't really enough to convince me. You lost what trust I had in you when you decided to steal from our corp.
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
Guest
« Reply #48 on: January 31, 2014, 01:17:05 AM »

I understand your vote JJ,  let's meet out there for lunch sometime.
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: February 05, 2014, 12:31:40 AM »

Let us look at where we are now...

Application submitted and acknowledged -  yes

Criteria:

1. (imposed by PMI) - 3 (three) members (stipulated by sargas to mean 'active' members) - yes
2. (imposed by both IMG and ITO) - 1 (one) month of age  - yes
3. (imposed by the council at whole) - dissolve NAP with SSS - yes

I am calling for a vote now.
Report to moderator   Logged
JamJulLison
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +55/-44
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: February 05, 2014, 12:34:01 AM »

fine with all that has happened, I vote no.  I don't think at this time you should be accepted. There is just too much suspicious stuff that has gone on for me to be sure about letting you in just yet.  Would the other two like to go ahead and vote?
Report to moderator   Logged
Dadds
Sergeant First Class
*

Reputation: +41/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 734



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: February 06, 2014, 05:48:50 AM »

To clarify points 2 and 3.
2. IMG NEVER imposed a time frame to be a member before being considered, being 1 month. My comment was that you need to be a corp for more than a day and show that you are developing into a reliable corporation for the GC, to be considered. If that takes 1 week, 1 month, or 1 year, so be it.
3. IMG never insisted on dissolution of a NAP. It was never presented in a unified call for a vote with the GC to allow or deny access to a member based in its NAP and so was not IMPOSED (remember, we are a self regulating org, we dont impose our rules or standards on others. We just hope others will follow in our footsteps). We merely pointed out that your particular NAP was at a conflict of interest with the GC resolve. This conflict you would have been well aware of since being a former member of a GC corp, it was widely known that SSS and in particular Raphael was labelled an outlaw and had a KoS placed on him. And yet you went ahead and opened up dialog with his corporation anyway knowing that it would look highly suspicious at the very least as to your nature toward him and his enemies.
Based on the recent activities witnessed by this office and in particular reviewing actions of credability and stability with regard to items 2 and 3 of the mandate Sargas believes he has qualified for, my advice to Aysle would be to vote to deny at this time entry into the GC for the corporation EOS
Report to moderator   Logged

___________________________________________
Dadds
Commander-in-Chief [IMG], Galactic Council member
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: February 07, 2014, 04:16:02 PM »

that's one negative vote, waiting on ITO and IMG.
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: February 11, 2014, 03:50:11 PM »

 coffee1

still waiting...
Report to moderator   Logged
JamJulLison
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +55/-44
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: February 12, 2014, 02:54:54 AM »

We are still waiting on ITO's new leader to get his forum powers.  I PMed siremi about it but sometimes it can take a while.  He is welcome to go ahead and vote though.
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: February 19, 2014, 12:25:17 AM »

 fishing1

still waiting...
Report to moderator   Logged
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: February 25, 2014, 09:42:06 PM »

still waiting...


Report to moderator   Logged
FreezeLove
Lance Corporal
*

Reputation: +4/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 50



View Profile
« Reply #57 on: February 25, 2014, 10:43:05 PM »

Feel for you Sargas. confused
Report to moderator   Logged


You can call me what you want, just dont call me late for dinner!
sargas
First Sergeant
*

Reputation: +291/-39
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


wandering teacher of the bizarre and unusual


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: March 01, 2014, 01:51:11 AM »

The Sargasian Empire formally requests admission to the Galactic Council.

well, it has been two months...

I see a vote of NO from TGE,

There is a NON-VOTING opinion from the leader of IMG, but the voting rep has been absent for over 19 days (leading me to beieve that the voting element of IMG doesn't care one way or the other).

ITO seems to be following their perceived 'don't care enough to vote' status...

Therefore, this application is being considered by me to be 'on hold'...

Thank you for your consideration and please let me know when and if this vote is ever concluded (so that I may close my books).

this topic is now closed (even if I cannot lock one of my...)
« Last Edit: March 01, 2014, 01:55:35 AM by sargas » Report to moderator   Logged
Dadds
Sergeant First Class
*

Reputation: +41/-143
Offline Offline

Posts: 734



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: March 01, 2014, 01:52:22 AM »

In absence of my rep, IMG (thought we already settled this) votes "no"
Report to moderator   Logged

___________________________________________
Dadds
Commander-in-Chief [IMG], Galactic Council member
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!